Tags

,

Even The Economist is in on the issues of multiployment:

“The on-demand economy is already provoking political debate…
Society gains because idle resources are put to use.

The truth is more nuanced. Consumers are clear winners; so are Western workers who value flexibility over security, such as women who want to combine work with child-rearing. Taxpayers stand to gain if on-demand labour is used to improve efficiency in the provision of public services.

This sense of nuance should inform policymaking. Governments that outlaw on-demand firms are simply handicapping the rest of their economies. But that does not mean they should sit on their hands. The ways governments measure employment and wages will have to change. Many European tax systems treat freelances as second-class citizens, while American states have different rules for “contract workers” that could be tidied up.

http://ift.tt/1wBntnC

and

http://ift.tt/1wADcTS
Workers on tap
IN THE early 20th century Henry Ford combined moving assembly lines with mass labour to make building cars much cheaper and quicker—thus turning the automobile…

Cross-posted from Facebook on January 06, 2015 at 01:08PM